Tuesday, July 18, 2006

Paper Assignments; or, trying to understand the student mind

I am working on my classes for the fall; specifically, I’m looking at my Composition I classes (I have three sections of that) and, even more specifically, I am looking at the Compare/Contrast assignment I give for their second papers, and it’s really starting to piss me off.

My Compare/Contrast assignment has always been based on advertisement. The introduction to the assignment reads:

“…it’s safe to assume that the media have a profound affect on our culture as a whole, as well as on individual minds. During this unit, we will be looking extensively at advertisement specifically and how it works. Advertisement speaks to us, and presents a chicken-or-the-egg paradox: Is advertisement a reflection of our culture, or does advertisement shape what our culture is? These are the two fundamental questions guiding our study for next couple of weeks.”

I think this is brilliant, of course.

Anyway, the assignment goes on to ask students to find two ads that are related in some way, do a thorough analysis of them, and write a 2-3 page paper based on their findings.

To my surprise, students pretty much hate this assignment. First off, they don’t know what the point is of doing ad analysis when they claim that they never pay attention to advertisement anyway. Secondly, they have a helluva time knowing what it means to look beyond what is there in full color on the page. Many simply won’t make the leap from what’s there to what it means. To help them out, I show Tough Guise and Killing Us Softly III (one is about the portrayal of men in the media, and the other is about women’s image in advertisement) as a way of looking at larger cultural influences and how they differ between the sexes. I do this to help, I really do, but many have apparently viewed my showing these films as a not-too-subtle suggestion that they must choose men/women ads to compare/contrast (and they must side with the women!!) if they are to do well on the papers. This could not be further from the truth, and at one point last semester, I let them now outright that, and I quote, “This could not be further from the truth!”

So here I am. The summer more than half over, and I need to make some decisions. I don’t want to let go of my ad analysis, but how do I get students into this assignment? Perhaps it is a matter of getting them interested in the material, the broader philosophical and socio-economic issues that are in the ads. That certainly won’t make things any easier, though. Another difficulty will be letting students know that they have the power to look at ads and participate in the exploration of what ideas they present. It’s simply ridiculous to think that ads don’t represent anything in our society (which is also a card students will play: “This doesn’t mean anything!”); though they are fake realities, they are realities that we literally and figuratively buy into. And that’s worth looking into.

3 Comments:

At 9:50 AM, Blogger Amy Dusek said...

What the? You got me all fired up to slap those students in the face!

It is brilliant Kelli.

My only solution for you is to come teach at The Art Institutes International of Minnesota (the school I graduated from). Students there would love that assignment. We talked alot about advertisement in general, including men's and women's roles that advertisement defines...in marketing classes to psychology classes. How can these students not think this subject is interesting? Argh.

Some ideas...I don't know if this will help, but it's worth a try:

Maybe you could show advertisements from other eras, say the 1950's for example and have discussion from there...Did these ads define men/women's roles or did they reflect what was already there? Compare the ads to today's ads.

Also, another interesting exercise might be comparing role reversal in ads. Get a bunch of examples of men's and women's ads. Then take an ad, for example, a woman's fashion ad... have a guy go in front of the class and pose like the woman in the ad see how silly he looks.

 
At 4:23 PM, Blogger Kelli said...

Hi Amy,
I love the idea of role-reversal in ads. I think that comparison of eras would be great as well, though finding the ads might be slightly more difficult. Believe me, I've thought before about how I might not be teaching in the right place for the assignment... but, somehow, I refuse to believe that it's unimportant for students at 2-year schools, so I keep hammering away at it!! Thanks for the thoughts...

 
At 8:11 AM, Blogger J. said...

Hi Kelli,

I like your assignment, too! Perhaps you just need better materials for helping them read, see, and interpret the ads more specifically. You know, a "how to" process for deconstruction. I have a great handout in my office that I got from a colleague. I'll get you the name of it at least...

 

Post a Comment

<< Home